Towards an iterative model for Nemetics

Consider :  NemiString is one of the key concepts of nemetics. What if an Nstring is composed of three kinds of nemes that when joined behave consistent with the maths of wave dynamics.

In this context, Rwave are the events that are Noticed and thus trigger waves of emotion and cognition. It can also be described as What one Sees. It might called the Notice string.

 Gwave is as in every nemetic RGB wave model is behavior at the scale of interest.  In nemetical terms it is the wave of Exhange. 

The Bwave is the nString that captures an evidenced based and critical narrative. One might say the Bwave is similar to what has been called Slow Thinking. In nemetical jargon it might be described as the Engage.Mull string. 

So in the snapshot below. the oval areas mark strings of Rnemes, Gnemes, Bnemes embedded in a a larger nString. The idea is that  every nString can be described as R weighted, G weighted and Bwieghted strings. The greater number of R nemes would result in an Rweighted nString. The same definition apples to B and G nemes.

Consider the following snapshot. 

After a number of iterations it's a snapshot of a moving wave form. The idea here is that as the overall nString vibrates mini strings quickly appear and disappear. The particular string that separates is described above as GGBR, GGB, and RGB strings.

If we can build a three string model some mechanisms can be studied. My conjecture is the strong force is that  like nemes attract. R tends to bind to R, G tends to bind to G, B tend to bind to B.  

However, the countervailing force emerges as in the snapshot above as smaller nStrings are "freed" according to the maths of wave mechanics. For example in the GGB string above emits . Two G nemes and One B neme. If the GGB string is in a proximate postion to a BBB string, the chances of successful Exchange as the B emits one and the BBB emits three, the chance of a link being created by persistent neme exchange increases. 

If and only if the initial exchange leads to persistent exchange the GGB and BBB strings are pulled closer together. The new string that is formed is GGBBBB. Therefore it would emit 2 G nemes for every 4 Bnemes. To continue one step further , the GGBBBB string has a 66% chance of exchanging with another B wave and a 33% chance of exchanging with a Bneme on a proximate String.

So the conjecture is that an iterative model based on these simple rules will make various patterns of emergence. 

The further conjecture is that by controlling the variables of Freq, Amplitude, Damping and End point on Three Strings, we will be able to see and explore enough patterns of emergence to find ones that map to exchange data in the real world.

All comments are needed and welcome to refine and continue down this path.

Nemetics Pyschology BiPolar 2

The wave simulator variables are here provisionally reframed as nemetical concepts.

Amplitude & Frequency = Energy of nemEX ( Information moving thru the Brain in this context.)

Damping = Constraints. ( Impulse Control in this context.) 

Tension = Attractions of nemes into a nSTring. ( narrative )

Endpoint = Expectation of neme exchange. In this experiment ( Perceived need to communicate.) 

( Changes in variables are applied to previous state.) 

Figure 1

A&F = 75 D = 30 T = 100  Endpoint  ( EP ) = fixed
Time = .04 secs

Figure 2.
A & F & D  & Endpoint Unchanged
Tension 50
Time 54:77

Figure 3
A & F & EP unchanged
D = 30 T = appx 25
Time 1:22:66

Figure 4.1
Settings unchanged
Time 1:51:33

Figure 5
A & F & T & EP unchanged
D = 0  
Time 2:35

( D = 0 is state of no friction - 100% lack of Impulse Control. )

Figure 5.1
A & F & D & EP unchanged
Tension = 100
Time 2:23:86

Figure 5.2
Settings Unchanged
Time 2:48:69

Figure 5.3
Settings Unchanged
Time 3:00:97

What I see:
High NemiString tension ( a closed narrative ) iterates to incoherence at this scale of observation.

Figure 6
A & F & D & EP unchanged
Damping 30
Time 3:16

What I see
 is the critical role of Damping ( Impulse Control in this context ) to quickly return to coherence.

 Curious what you see?

Nemetic Psychology Visualizing Bi Polar Disorder

The snapshots below are from a Wave Simulator used for students studying Physics.  My contention is that by using nemetic framework it can show what a Bi Polar spectrum might "look like."

Figure 1.

In a nemetic framework, Amplitude and Frequency ( A ) map to neme Exchange within in the Brain of someone who tends to BiPolar. High Frequency and Amplitude are "ideas" that create the sensation of a brain that "doesn't stop."

Damping ( B ) maps to Impulse Control in the sense of slowing down the flow of nemes between the ears.

Tension ( C ) emulates the coherence of a narrative. Narrative maps to nemiString.

The end point ( D ) maps to the expectation of Exchange.    A fixed end point maps to the situation that has a high expectation of Exchange. It could be a deadline or an important meeting or other requirements of a "day job."

Figure one is a snapshot with high amplitude and frequency or nemex. Low damping in the sense of allowing nemex to proceed at a speed that is only lightly controlled. Tension is set high as many creatives tend to have a strong narrative that creates the feeling of making sense.

Figure 2
Figure 2 are same settings with damping set to 0 and with a loose end ( E )  .
The loose end emulates the condition in which the individual can choose whether to Exchange ornot.
My conjecture is this is a picture of "Flow." 

In the next series of posts, I will manipulate some of the variables to see what we can be seen.

Nemetical Psychology

The contention is that a nemetic framework will apply to any Complex Adaptive System. In my opinion psychology is the study of Complex Adaptive Systems in one's brain and body.

Following is one series of pictures that might capture a nervous breakdown as a stage of bi polar disorder.

 The setup. Complex boundaries. 

Low Frequency. Low brightness. Porous walls. 

Fixed Border around the window.

Time X

Time X + a

Time X + a + b

Time X + a + b + c

Time X + a + b + c + d

Resilience Nemetics Ripple Tank Simulator

My conjecture is that it is possible to model resilience with the Ripple Tank wave simulator. The notion is that if one can go from maximum brightness to minimum brightness to the original state of the 3d wave coherence that is a mark of "Resilience.

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

With these settings the wave form retains coherence at any level of Brightness.  My hunch is that "brightness" will turn out to be a surrogate for "Amplitude." 

My further conjecture is the Golden Spiral will turn out to be the most resilient shape of constraints.