Njournal 14.3 Towards a Nemetic Math

Let:

I = Intent  

n  =  neme 

nSt = nStrings connect Nemes.
nTu = nTube coherent bundles of strings.
nCl = nCell coherent bundle of tubes. The bundle is bounded by a woven membrane of strings and tubes.

nPx = Nemiplexity a complex adaptive system which has been articulated as strings, tubes, cells.

Nemes are nested in Strings which are nested in Tubes which are nested in Cells. Written as

n@nSt@nTu@nCl@nPlx  

Any nemPlexity becomes a neme when observed from outside. It remains a nemPlexity when viewed from the inside.

Version 3.0 of the fundamental theorem is

ΔI = f (nk )

The conjecture is the value of k and function f differ significantly in specific Contexts. Below are 8 of the many possible spectrums that specify a Context.  If the spectrums are divided to define discrete variables,  the result is matrix of possibilities. The number of cells in such a matrix defines 86,400 possible Contexts.

1. Urban v suburban v small city v rural
2. Baby boomers v  Gen X v Millennials v Gen Z.
3. Native Born v Foreign Born
4. Catholic v Protestant v Muslim v Jewish v Asian v Secularist
5. Caucasian v American Black v  Latin v Asians v Native People
6. Male v Female v LGBT
7. Very rich, rich, median, poor, very poor.
8. North East v Midwest v South v Middle States v West v West Coast

Nemes (nemiPlexities) that define the Nemplexity of US Politics.

Democratic Party v Republican Party

Republican Party (Tea Party v Populist v Establishment )

Democratic Party ( Liberal v Populist v Establishment )

Independents ( Non Active politically v Active Politically)

Business and Non profits.

Extractive Global Organization vs Global Customer Facing vs Global Internet Org  vs Domestic Large Org v Small Org v Micro Org.