Wave or Particle in Nemetics

" @toughLoveforx I'd never really considered nshapes as voids between ntubes. My nshapes were always in the tubes: infopackets "

Interesting point that got me thinking. My take as of today is that it goes to whether one looks complexity as waves or particles.  In the Sound Wave simulation Figure 1. is in waves. Figure 2 is precisely the same underlying complexity in particles. 

Figure 1.

Figure 2. 

In both images coherent patterns are nShapes. The rectangle merely points to corresponding areas of coherence. My view is that any area of coherence falls under the category of a nShape. So nemes, nStrings and nTubes all assume nShapes given a specific history and forces acting at the moment of observation. 

The wave view ( Figure 1. ) privileges the motion in a nField. Wave based patterns of energy.

The Particular view ( figure 2 ) enables looking down one level. Each ball represents a neme.  

The black areas in the particles view are similar to the light grey areas in the wave view. I think it's a useful distinction to call the Black areas an nTube nShape. The areas in which the nemes are aggregated into coherent patterns nString nShapes.

Wave Simulation Tool

Interesting tool at http://www.falstad.com/ripple/   Below are different views of a two source in phase simulation.  The 3D select button allows rotation in 3D. Pretty cool, I thought.

NemiTubes v NemiShapes & Whirlpools

As of 11:36 AM EDT  June 14...


Nice comment from Dibyendu on twitter this morning set off the following exploration...

Dibyendu De ‏@TheDesignKata

@toughloveforx lovely! Suggest small change: it is the pattern that creates nShape @ddrrnt

Got me thinking about a possible relation between nTubes and nShapes. "pattern creates nShape" seems precisely correct to me. It points to the question of the angle and distance of the observer. From a straight on view, from an appropriate distance the nShape is defined by this particular visualization tool. In that context the overall view is defined by the overall box that displays the interaction of waves and nemes.

Research note:  It would be good to have a tool that had more flexible  borders and the ability to show the wave patterns when there are speakers at the top, bottom and coming in from the right hand side. More clearly emulates the condition of living in an environment where information is coming from all sides. 
                   

Figure 1.

My conjecture is that at the level of interactions, it might be helpful to consider that when an nemiTube is well bounded it tends to form a nShape. 

I'm seeing nShapes as loosely defined but bounded on all sides nemtubes. At the bottom of the picture above one can see a semipermeable boundary around the indication nShapes. At the top of the pic, one can call them nTubes as one end is open.

The implication is that nShapes have a space between the strings that removes friction from nEx. The less friction the greater ease of nEx. It points to the fact that if all the members of a group "speak the same language" nEx is radically increased. Increased nEx is associated with generation of power, and the space to Engage and Mull.


Whirlpools
Another issue Dibyendu brought up and building on a observation of Sean.   If one imagines Figure 1 rotating on the axis of the dotted white line, a whirlpool emerges.

 Using Figure 2 as an emergent pattern  a different kind of whirlpool forms if rotated around the dotted line,  This time in the shape of a bowl. The notion of whirlpool to me is connected with the creation of pull.  Not sure where this is going yet, but seems to me Figure 2 might be a visualization for bottom up development.

Figure 2, is the same settings with a closed barrier between the bottom and top. The shape transition from Figure 1 only by inserting a closed barrier. At the moment of observation, there is no new energy coming into the the bottom half of the Figure. Interesting that disconnecting the energy still creates new patterns.

                                                                              Figure 2.

Nemetics Visuals 1.5

Recently I've started playing with a Wave Interference Simulator. It has controls for frequency, Amplitude, one or two wave generators, the spacing between the wave generators, barrier or no barrier. One or two slits in the barrier, the size and  spacing between splits. 

It seems to be a helpful tool to visualize some basic nemetic concepts. The first image below emulates free exchange within authentic constraints, or in nemetics code Free nEx w/in AuCnst .

The balls emulate nemes - the basic unit of interest in nemetics. The radiating lines are nStrings; the black spaces between the nStrings are nTubes. The overall pattern is the nShape. The waves and especially the wave interference patterns are nFields.

In the image below, a barrier with no splits has been inserted. This could have many interpretations. It's an elite in a situation of no money exchange. Money is taken as nemes. The flow of money is taken as neme Exchange. It is neme Exchange that creates Energy.

Note the coherent patterns of nStrings on the left side of the barrier. nStrings overlap. A diversity of nTubes creating a complex but coherent pattern. One the right side of the barrier are patterns. But a nemiTube that is separate from the barrier. Whatever energy exists comes from the non elite. Not precisely sure how that maps to the real world. But it is interesting.

Another interpretation is the image above emulates a open classroom. Generating long nStrings into the world. The nemes are taken as students. The nStrings are taken as the energy in which the student is embedded. The dark spaces are nemiTubes that are bounded with Strings. Emulates peer learning. Although this pic doesn't show it, well bounded nTubes take out friction from neme Exchange nEx. Note the nTube proximate to the barrier is not well bounded as nStrings only create the border on the right. On the left we have a boundary that does not Exchange.

Thanks to Sean Grainger (see comments below. ) In the optimal visualization tool it would be possible to rotate the 2d image to 3d by spinning around the dotted line access.

It's interesting to imagine the different shapes generated by picture one v picture two. In picture one the field would generate as a whirlpool. Pulling nemes from the center. In picture two, with no direct connection behind the barrier, the field would settle into more like a mushroom. Pull would not be possible in that case.

Nemetics Visuals 1.0